Ściana płaczu Shutterstock

[rachwal]

Pozwolę sobie na cytat, nie wiadomo jak długo to tam powisi:

We can go through all the trouble of asking businesses for permission, setting up set, doing all the prep work and the rest of it to shhot footage and stills and the rest of it.

The problem is, Shutterstock, is your stupid reviewers. Yes I call them stupid, sorry, don’t mind if you feel hurt. A content artist can go through all the trouble of making an image or a footage (plan, shoot and post production etc.), but at the end of the day, it is your reviewers (who I am sure feel like Gods themselves) are the ones who can make or break a footage or image entering the market. No matter how intently your super models are smiling and how sweet the client-business interaction is shown and how good your setup is – it may still be rejected for “limited commercial value” or “poor or uneven lighting”. Believe me, it is the fact.

Do you know why there is a high acceptance rate for footage? That’s because Shutterstock still has lower than 1 million footage in the library. Do you reckon Shutterstock will be so generous if it had say 12 million or say 20 million? Nopes.

So don’t come here and lecture on what sells and how the submitters can benefit from them.

To komć do wczorajszego spamu SS
http://www.shutterstock.com/buzz/tips-fo...ion-shoots