2018-12-13, 09:03:37
(Ten post był ostatnio modyfikowany: 2018-12-13, 09:08:47 {2} przez mircovacca.)
First of all I am very sorry that I am not writing in Polish. I am fine with speaking... I live in poznan 7 years now and have two kids. So I hope they will teach me writing 
.
Adalbert. Also sorry to you for some comments I made. Thats why comments on forum should be always overtought. After changing some private messages I am sure you are a fine guy.
I know how to take good photos I believe but Shutterstock is not the place to showcase them. Shutterstock is not a premium stock agency. We earn 38 or 36 cents and even lower. Next to this those images are selling good enough. I would not spend time since 2011 to have 30k port if they didnt. I can put many printscreens from many of those product photos that have more then 50 sales. I have photos that sold over 1000 or 3000 times. I really dont need to proof myself. You can search for me on google "Mirco Vacca Shutterstock" It will show you many results of my "shampoo" photos placed on many online articles. Still it doesnt include all by far. This doesnt disturb me. The disturbing thing here is that I am accused for spam. Thats not true. I am following all the rules of shutterstock.
The problem here are the titles for illustrative editorial content. Shutterstock obligates to add city date and place for them. So if somebody shoots photos of coca cola on white background in a studio in Warsaw it will show up in the search therm Warsaw. It is a mistake of Shutterstock rules.
On the other hand if a buyer needs a picture of the Poznan Stary Browar shopping mall he will not enter only "Poznan". He should enter "Stary Browar" or "Poznan shopping mall" if he is serious. It is all about right use of keywording. Your only competition are the ones in the same keywords and not all database.
.Adalbert. Also sorry to you for some comments I made. Thats why comments on forum should be always overtought. After changing some private messages I am sure you are a fine guy.
I know how to take good photos I believe but Shutterstock is not the place to showcase them. Shutterstock is not a premium stock agency. We earn 38 or 36 cents and even lower. Next to this those images are selling good enough. I would not spend time since 2011 to have 30k port if they didnt. I can put many printscreens from many of those product photos that have more then 50 sales. I have photos that sold over 1000 or 3000 times. I really dont need to proof myself. You can search for me on google "Mirco Vacca Shutterstock" It will show you many results of my "shampoo" photos placed on many online articles. Still it doesnt include all by far. This doesnt disturb me. The disturbing thing here is that I am accused for spam. Thats not true. I am following all the rules of shutterstock.
The problem here are the titles for illustrative editorial content. Shutterstock obligates to add city date and place for them. So if somebody shoots photos of coca cola on white background in a studio in Warsaw it will show up in the search therm Warsaw. It is a mistake of Shutterstock rules.
On the other hand if a buyer needs a picture of the Poznan Stary Browar shopping mall he will not enter only "Poznan". He should enter "Stary Browar" or "Poznan shopping mall" if he is serious. It is all about right use of keywording. Your only competition are the ones in the same keywords and not all database.