2016-05-27, 20:51:23
maccio - pisałem kiedyś do supportu alamy z pytaniem, czy moge zdjecia oferowane na shutterstocku (a wiec RF) oferować na alamy jako RM.
Odpowiedź była jednoznaczna - powinienem wszędzie oferować ten sam rodzaj licencji.
Zerknij jeszcze tu:
http://blog.imagebrief.com/the-differenc...alty-free/
I fragment:
"Can royalty free images be licensed as rights managed and vice versa?
No. This might be a no-brainer for some, but let’s talk it through. If a client purchases a rights-managed image, they have expectations on the exclusive rights(or non-exclusive depending on what’s negotiated) to an image. Let’s say they buy an image with exclusive rights for one year in North America. The buyer will then have the expectation that they’re the only one with those rights for that time in that location. Buyers purchase rights-managed images with the expectation that the rights management and usually higher price means that image has been used a lot less. The ideal being it is less likely to conflict with another company’s usage, even without exclusivity.
Now let’s say a photographer has that same—or very similar—image also listed on royalty-free stock sites or has sold it in the past, then there’s a problem…a big, fat problem. That’s like Picasso selling a one-of-a-kind piece to a collector who thinks the piece is an original, but in fact ol’ Picasso continues to paint duplicates and is selling those too. Another example: A farmer leases a portion of her land to another farmer for a certain amount of time, but then she forgot that she leased that same piece of land to her friend to raise crops on at the same time. That’s not going to work and neither party is going to be happy. The same goes with selling rights to images.
Plain and simple, if you have images in a royalty-free marketplace or royalty free stock site, then you can’t sell those images as rights-managed. Along the same lines, if an image is listed as royalty-free somewhere, it cannot be submitted to rights-managed briefs—whether the images are royalty free on ImageBrief or elsewhere.
The main lesson here: If you license something royalty-free, there’s no going back (unless that photo is never bought or licensed) but in the end, as a photographer your earnings could be much greater and more frequent."
ale wystarczy poprzeglądać galerie na alamy by zauważyć, że wiele oferowanych tam obrazów - jako RM - mozna bez problemu kupic gdzie indziej jako RF... czyli albo sprzedający maja cały czas problem z rozróżnianiem licencji albo generalnie jest z tymi licencjami bałagan...
Odpowiedź była jednoznaczna - powinienem wszędzie oferować ten sam rodzaj licencji.
Zerknij jeszcze tu:
http://blog.imagebrief.com/the-differenc...alty-free/
I fragment:
"Can royalty free images be licensed as rights managed and vice versa?
No. This might be a no-brainer for some, but let’s talk it through. If a client purchases a rights-managed image, they have expectations on the exclusive rights(or non-exclusive depending on what’s negotiated) to an image. Let’s say they buy an image with exclusive rights for one year in North America. The buyer will then have the expectation that they’re the only one with those rights for that time in that location. Buyers purchase rights-managed images with the expectation that the rights management and usually higher price means that image has been used a lot less. The ideal being it is less likely to conflict with another company’s usage, even without exclusivity.
Now let’s say a photographer has that same—or very similar—image also listed on royalty-free stock sites or has sold it in the past, then there’s a problem…a big, fat problem. That’s like Picasso selling a one-of-a-kind piece to a collector who thinks the piece is an original, but in fact ol’ Picasso continues to paint duplicates and is selling those too. Another example: A farmer leases a portion of her land to another farmer for a certain amount of time, but then she forgot that she leased that same piece of land to her friend to raise crops on at the same time. That’s not going to work and neither party is going to be happy. The same goes with selling rights to images.
Plain and simple, if you have images in a royalty-free marketplace or royalty free stock site, then you can’t sell those images as rights-managed. Along the same lines, if an image is listed as royalty-free somewhere, it cannot be submitted to rights-managed briefs—whether the images are royalty free on ImageBrief or elsewhere.
The main lesson here: If you license something royalty-free, there’s no going back (unless that photo is never bought or licensed) but in the end, as a photographer your earnings could be much greater and more frequent."
ale wystarczy poprzeglądać galerie na alamy by zauważyć, że wiele oferowanych tam obrazów - jako RM - mozna bez problemu kupic gdzie indziej jako RF... czyli albo sprzedający maja cały czas problem z rozróżnianiem licencji albo generalnie jest z tymi licencjami bałagan...