2011-10-07, 20:05:22
Dostałem takiego maila:
" .... We regularly review the images on our site and the accuracy of the
annotation attached to the images.
We have noticed that for image C13HMD you have answered the question
"Does this image contain property that needs a release for commercial
use?" with "NO".
It is our view that this image does contain property.
Please note that property can be physical property (houses, cars etc)
and/or intellectual property (logos, trademarks).
We have changed the answer to the question "Does this image contain
property that needs a release for commercial use?" to "YES"
Our customers rely on the accuracy and integrity of our data and this
process protects both you and Alamy from potential legal disputes. .... "
Czy ja dobrze rozumiem, że zmienili mi fakt, że do tego zdjęcia potrzebne jest zezwolenie?
Jeżeli tak (a owego nie mam, bo uważam, że nie trzeba) to czy nie powinienem czasem usunąć tej foty? Powinni raczej poprosić mnie o zezwolenie.
" .... We regularly review the images on our site and the accuracy of the
annotation attached to the images.
We have noticed that for image C13HMD you have answered the question
"Does this image contain property that needs a release for commercial
use?" with "NO".
It is our view that this image does contain property.
Please note that property can be physical property (houses, cars etc)
and/or intellectual property (logos, trademarks).
We have changed the answer to the question "Does this image contain
property that needs a release for commercial use?" to "YES"
Our customers rely on the accuracy and integrity of our data and this
process protects both you and Alamy from potential legal disputes. .... "
Czy ja dobrze rozumiem, że zmienili mi fakt, że do tego zdjęcia potrzebne jest zezwolenie?
Jeżeli tak (a owego nie mam, bo uważam, że nie trzeba) to czy nie powinienem czasem usunąć tej foty? Powinni raczej poprosić mnie o zezwolenie.
